Shariah Law VS Secular Liberalism



Last updated: 18th of Oct, 2021.

By: Mustafa Sahin 


Let’s analyse the difference and it’s impacts…….


Secular Liberal Westerners would say;

“Our ancestors were brutish, immoral, uncivilized idiots who knew nothing of the world. We are vastly superior to any other time in history!”


A common sentiment you hear today is that humanity has “progressed” beyond the ignorance and ethics of generations before us. Many people have this strange belief that after they were born the world changed for the better — that they were somehow gifted with an ethos and intelligence that rivals the collective IQ of everyone who has since died. Because we now have the Internet, iPhones, and modern medicine we are somehow “better” than the entirety of humanity before our existence.

But this is such a deluded view of reality.

Sure, our technology and science have become more advanced; but is this how we define human existence? Does all of this make us the best example of human achievement and behaviour? I beg to differ.

Send most anyone out into the wilderness without modern tech and they would end up dying in a matter of days. Most children of the past would outperform most contemporary adults in basic modes of survival. Yet, despite such incompetence, we call ourselves superior? Even with our technology and medicines, we have created a system where superficial and unhealthy foods are easier to access than organics — yet, we are superior? Despite having a wealth of information at our fingertips, literacy and comprehension have declined drastically across the world; people know more about their favourite reality TV shows and musicians than they do basic history and science — yet, we are superior? Despite our claims to civility, we still murder each other in horrific ways and wars are waged in such a manner that the vast majority of casualties are civilians — yet, we are superior? At least our ancestors had the excuse of lacking so many of the privileges we claim to possess.

However, what is most egregious about this myth is not the fact that our technological advancements don’t necessarily correspond with our ethical or rational decision making, but that it is such slander of those who came before us. How would civilization have gotten to this point had it not been for the functioning of humanity prior? How could such “brutish”, “immoral”, and “uncivilized idiocy” possibly bring us to this period? Would we not have ceased to exist by this point?

Certainly. But those who favour such a myth are not interested in the details; the nuances of human civilization and the sacrifices our ancestors had to make to get us this far. No, they were all inferior, because we must be superior — we must be special.

If there was ever a field of historical revisionism based on narcissism, our generation would certainly be the exemplar for future generations. Hopefully, they come to realize this. #PleaseReflect

– Asadullah Ali

Let’s continue, Westerners will heavily boast about how due to Science and technology and modern way of thinking, how the West has modernized from the dark ages, and how it has developed gracefully to a better world under the so-called era of “Enlightenment. And how Religion particularly Islam has not progressed and has left many Muslim nations backwards, they argue Muslims or Islam has failed civilisation as a whole it is because it’s their religion that has kept them that way for many thousands of years. They will argue, religious teachings are detrimental to today’s living standards and has been the root cause of today’s problems. And that Muslims need to give up their religion so that they can progress and become like them.

Well, we have documented a comparison, between the two worlds and the two thoughts and teachings, and when we analyse we shall see, the fruits that are produced between the east and the west. After you have seen a comprehensive basic level analysis between the two, such as Shariah teachings versus those taught under secular liberalism we shall see, exactly which system has contributed to the success and what system has led to being a failure for humankind. Do also consider, all though most Muslim nations do not run on Shariah rule of law,  they overall surprising do much better than the West. We could not imagine how much more it would improve if the law of the land adhered to a Shariah-based system. 


A Westerner mocks Afghanistan for reintroducing segregated Schools between boys and girls.





Modern-day 20th-century deaths caused by Muslims vs Westerners

Shariah Law = Contributed (2 million) killed.

Secular Liberalism   = Contributed (100 million) killed.



Human Rights abusers?

Shariah Law =  See below the two videos a comprehensive Explanation of human rights.

Part 1

Part 2

Secular Liberalism  = Claims to give Human rights. But if this is true, we need an explanation from them. Such as;

– Where is the right to leaking information. [1]
– Where is the right to have dual citizenship.[2]
– Where is the right to wear what you want.[3]
– Where is the right to burn a flag.[4]
– Where is the right to Hate speech.[5]
– Where is the right to Polygamy. [6]
– Where is the right, for religion in Politics.[7]

Should I continue with Liberal intolerance? Or perhaps you still think liberal values make more sense?


In addition an explanation of the Human rights abuses of the Afghani people.

Video 1

Video 2


Muslim Men beating women?





Do visist a debate and counter responses to a ExMuslim on a debate on Human rights:



Also visit: Are Secular Liberal Humanists really peaceful ?



[1] The US indictment accused Assange of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion by helping US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning gain access to privileged information

[2] Under section 44.1 Australian Law. If any member of Parliament holds dual citizenship will be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives. https://time.com/4898990/australia-dual-citizenship-politicians-joyce/

[3] The French ban on face covering (French: LOI n° 2010-1192: Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l’espace public,[1] “Law of 2010-1192: Act prohibiting concealment of the face in public space”)

[4] Greece, Germany, France & Spain do not allow, the flag or Anthem to be desecrated.

[5] Facebook has long banned hate speech — defined as violent or dehumanizing speech — based on race, gender, sexuality and other protected characteristics.

[6] In Australia, it is a criminal offence to marry a person when already married to another and is called bigamy.

[7] There is a separation between church and state. Generally, Western constitutions are not to be governed under religious law. Secular liberal laws, are above any religious influence and must be upheld as the highest form of authority. (Which means no Freedom for the religious doctrine to influence or mandate modern-day politics).



Shariah Law = Forbids Terrorism. In other words, intentionally going and targeting civilian population, women and children for example. Also note, there are more Terror attacks committed by Non-Muslims in the US than Muslims. For example, Muslim extremist’s who go ahead and commit acts of Terror, only account for 6% of Terrorist Attacks in the U.S

Non-Muslims however account for 90%
Of all the Terrorism cases in the U.S.





Secular Liberalism = All though Secular liberal countries forbid acts of terrorism, many war crimes have been committed by the West, from raping and killing Afgan civilians to Iraqis, and then you have the Bosnian Massacre committed by Western forces and the list goes on. Westerners even justify acts of Terrorism see video:



Shariah Law =Capital Punishment. Has least cases of Murder.

Secular Liberalism = Punishment to lenient. Therefore Has the Highest amount of Murder. Rates compared to Predominantly Muslim Population watch: https://youtu.be/t_gPky76zHc

FREEDOM of expression/Speech:

Shariah Law = Allows freedom of speech with certain boundaries. Except No other Religion being Taught in Mecca or Medina but allows it everywhere else in Addition, Islam allows constructive criticism, and debate and discourse. When it comes to politics under Shariah law, Islam may censor false news and propaganda that is promoted for the west to fight against Muslims. 

Secular Liberalism  = Allows Hate Speech in the U.S( but some western countries Ban hate speech like Race, Anti-Semite or Sexism. Australia, Germany, France and other European countries. They Also Ban, Burka in France and Ban Aspects of Islam law like Azthan from Minarets, also Polygammy recognition.

New Peer review study shows 40% of the Millennials Favour limited free speech:

Also, consider, the West also bans hate speech towards LGBTIQ and censors anti-LGBTIQ statements. Facebook is one mechanism the West censors free speech.  See more here:




Shariah Law= Punished if you were given all resources but still took the option of Evil.
Proof: Cutting hands of theifs

Secular Liberalism   = Very Lenient punishment. Results to the West having the highest level of theft in Society compared to the Muslim World.
Proof: http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Robberies

Social experiment shows Muslim countries are more honest than Western ones. Take a look:



#New statistical updates coming to this section.

Shariah Law= Capital Punishment

Secular Liberalism  = Lost War on Drugs. Because Laws are too lenient.
The war on drugs is Lost.
Tonny Abbot Admits: They can never win the War on Drugs.
Even U.N admits Losing War on Drugs.


Prostitution & PORNOGRAPHY

Shariah Law= Forbids it. And most Muslim countries make it ” illegal”.



Secular Liberalism= Legal. The Biggest Consumers/Profits by Western Nations. Even their top politicians are watching Pornography at their workplaces http://m.theage.com.au/victoria/former-liberal-adviser-says-pornography-was-distributed-inside-victorian-parliament-20141015-116p64.html

All though you can find articles published like this online, https://www.dnpindia.in/current-affairs/top-10-most-porn-watching-countries-in-the-world-pakistan-on-the-first-position/

Where they assert, that most of the top countries that watch Pornography are Muslims, like Pakistan, Egypt Turkey, Saudi Arabia etc. The publishers of this article seem to be ( Indian publishers ) who are biased towards Pakistan and Muslims, and their sources are questionable of a claimed survey conducted over 11 countries. Again it seems like an outdated survey that most likely has very little authenticity.

It is disputed here: https://propakistani.pk/2015/01/19/pakistan-gets-wrongly-labelled-top-porn-searching-nation-proofs/

I mean even if it were true, one could argue that both Pakistan, Egypt and Turkey, are “Secularisized nations” that are non-Shariah-compliant. Nevertheless, there is another study, which is conducted by one of the biggest Porn stations on social media, known as PornHub. And not a single Muslim country is found in the TOP 20.



Ghana is not world’s second-highest porn watching country – Israel Laryea fact checks


In fact according to Western Reports in 2015. Shows more evidence that most “porn searchers, comes again from Non-Muslim nations;




So these two articlcaststs doubts the survey that suggests Muslim nations rank the highest in Porn search when not a single Muslim nation is found in the top20 countries. The claims against Muslim nations topping the most watch list for Porn, Contradicts other Western sources that tell a very different story.



Shariah law  = Forbids its consumption.

Allah has “Spoken the Truth”, about Alcohol

“O you who believe! Intoxicants (all kinds of alcoholic drinks), gambling, idolatry, and divining arrows are an abomination of Satan’s handiwork. So avoid that so that you may be successful. Satan only wants to cause between you animosity and hatred through intoxicants and gambling and to avert you from the remembrance of Allah and prayer. So will you not desist?” (Verses 90 and 91of Surat Surat Al-Ma’idah).

ALCOHOL is classified as Carcinogen – A cancer-causing agent.

Source: https://www.cancervic.org.au/preventing-cancer/limit-alcohol/how-alcohol-causes-cancer



Secular Liberalism = Legal. Caused the Death of 3.3 Million People in 2012


By the way, their education system into drinking in moderation has failed. Because they always have a new wave, of the new generation who like to test the limits, and thus the cycle of damage continues.



Shariah Law= Forbids it. Though some scholar argue it’s permissible before the 6O day period. As the soul has not reached the fetus as understand by Islamic theology.

Secular Liberalism= Legal. Murders more than 1.21 million babies annually. http://www.operationrescue.org/about-abortion/abortions-in-america/


Women and Wealth Entitlement:

Shariah Law= Women in Islam do not have to share their wealth. The husband must provide everything.

Secular Liberalism  = Husband is not obliged to buy anything for Her it’s only optional. He’s not required to buy her house, pay for Rent, Buy her clothing and pay for Her bills or even buy her shopping like groceries.


Shariah Law= We Created men and women equal in Allah’s sight, though Islam understands they have biological differences. And Men and Women can understand they are different, but they can also work their differences harmoniously without trying to live up to man’s and women’s expectations. They each go at their own pace. Islam does believe however in certain gender roles.

Secular Liberalism = Believes in Equal Rights but check this out. It seems what they encourage isn’t reflecting in their modern Society:

Also consider: The Term (Feminism) originates from the Western Activists. This Term is Un-Known in the Muslim World due to Female oppression being Low in Muslim World. Most Feminist Movements are located in Western World.

U.S soldier, sexist comment?

American Soldier tells Iraqi soldiers that they are acting like a bunch of women. Due to them being scared and Coward.

See video: https://www.facebook.com/FireourGovernment/videos/415058006628433/

Also note, the West also believes in gender roles. That’s why they will never choose a woman to jump in the boxing ring to fight Mike Tyson. They will always pick a Man to do that.


Nuclear Weapons:

Shariah Law = Forbids its use.
All though Pakistan has Nukes, which is a Democratic constitution. A Real Shariah Law State forbids its use due to breaking Rules of engagement like Innocent lives, cutting down trees and livestock, and poisoning the crops.

Secular Liberalism = Legal, Example of use: Hiroshima/Nagasaki 120,000 Dead innocent women children including livestock, poisoned crops and land through depleted uranium causing years of Birth defects for generations to come.


Shariah Law = Forbids it.

Secular Liberalism = Legal. One of the main factors of the Spread of HIV.

Over 690 000 [500 000− 970 000] people died of HIV-related illnesses worldwide just alone  in 2019


Beastiality (Sexual intercourse with Animals:

Shariah Law = forbids it.

Have a read here:




Source: http://www.answering-christianity.com/sex_with_animals_forbidden.htm
Therefore Every Muslim country Forbids it.


Secular Liberalism=  There are still to this very day, Secular liberal countries that Legalize it.


See here, how Ex-Muslims who have become Secular and Liberal endorse Sex with Animals.


Shariah Law = Forbids it: http://islamqa.info/en/84982


Secular Liberalism= all though most Western countries make it illegal, under true Secular Liberal dogma, it is not illegal as it is Freedom of Right to do it. So long as you use Contraception and its consensual agreement. See here:


Shariah Law = Forbidden.

Secular Liberalism= Legal and encouraged. Fornication/Adultery caused the spread of Sexual Transmitted Disease 1 in 6 Females in West Contract STI

The U.S tops the Chart at 126 Million cases.

It is a scientifically proven fact that the more sexual partners a person’s had the less likely the person is to pair-bond (be committed) to a single partner in a long term relationship.

“women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship have an increased risk of marital dissolution.”

Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227546156_Premarital_Sex_Premarital_Cohabitation_and_the_Risk_of_Subsequent_Marital_Dissolution_Among_Women

Note, the source is non-Muslim, therefore their understanding of pre-marital courtship is different from that of Muslims.

So yes, you should ask and judge her based on her previous partner count if she is a good potential wife for you.

Also, consider the result of Fornication leads to a great contribution to these stats. Notice there all Non-Muslim nations at the highest;




Shariah Law = The only religion that has the phrase “only marry 1” but we can marry 2, 3 or 4 with the condition we act justly between them all.

Secular Liberalism = In the West you can be married and have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  girlfriends on the side there is no law to forbid this act.

In fact: More than 30,000 married Australians are found ‘cheating’ every month:


Furthermore a ExMuslim Atheist liberal, Harris Sultan boasts about having more women then Prophet Muhammed (pbuh)



Interesting that they mock Muslims for heaven with 72 Houri?



Shariah Law = Forbids it.

Secular Liberalism= Legal. In the United States of America since “Interest” is part of their economy the U.S financial system is under a Debt of 21 Trillion+ Dollars which faced Debt Crises. http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/


When it comes to “Riches” and Wealth.

Shariah Law = 

Secular Liberalism =

They write;



You say, so many Islamic countries are poor. That may be true, but 5 out of the 25 richest countries in the world happen to be Muslim. With the highest ranking GDP.



That said, most Muslim countries GDP is pretty much the standard of majority of the Western countries:


I know what a Western will say, they will say the reason why Muslim countries top the GDP is because of all that oil, and not because of their hard work.

Well, my response would be, it just shows how Allah blessed those Muslims, and they didn’t even have to work for it as a Dog.

Is it to know wonder that most of the biggest volumes of rich natural resources are found in the middle east? Is that just a coincidence or divine intervention?

Even President Donald Trump advocating looting the oil. Take a listen;

Also, consider most Western countries did a lot of bad deeds to get where they did, besides the industrial revolution. Take for example how Brittian looted over 45 trillion Dollars from India.

Much more looting by the West could be mentioned, how they looted blood diamonds out of Africa.


And how the West invaded almost the whole globe, from the West to the East. Like South Africa, India, Australia to America where it reaped from all its natural resources, and then to add insult to injury took slaves out of Africa to work forcefully and build the West.

But yeh, please go on and tell us more about how the Western world is so rich compared to the Muslim nations.

Also, consider all though Western countries are rich, they also have the biggest debt out of any other nation. See the next post below. Also, his Mikes comment about Muslims giving charity to religious institutions, instead of using the money to help the poor. This comment is stupid, because when Muslims donate money to their religious organisations, that money is used to help the poor people as most of those funds go to help projects such as building orphanage homes, and water wells in Africa so people can have access to clean water, including the donations to help the poor with food. See our post under “Charity and Donations” it’s Religious people who donate more money to the poor than those who call themselves Atheists who appeal to secular liberalism.


A country with the most Debt:

Shariah Law = Encourages not to get into financial debts and Forbids things like loans that have “interest”. And so when we look at the World debt Crises, the Muslim nations are doing much better. 

Secular Liberalism= Non-Muslim countries have the worst record in the “debt” department take a look at the top countries:




Charity and Donation’s.

Shariah Law = Compulsory if you’re able. Known as Zakah. Hence a Solution to End World Poverty.

Secular Liberalism= Not compulsory rather Optional even if you are a Billionaire. Hence has contributed to World Poverty. The Poor give more money to Charity then the Rich a study finds. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5937100

Religious people are more Generous another study finds. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10885180/Religion-makes-people-more-generous.html

Interesting how secular liberalism shuns organized Religion right?


Biggest Polluters in the World:

Shariah Law = Not the biggest Pollution.

Secular Liberalism = Australia & U.S.A biggest Pollutionists http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2009-09-11/australians-the-worlds-worst-polluters/1425986

Slavery and Sex Slavery (Rape):

Shariah Law = Forbids Colonial Style Slavery the Quran came to overall encourage to free the Slaves. Do listen to response here. We also show how Sexual Slavery was condoned in the Bible:


Secular Liberalism = Will often quote Dubai as Slavery like Work Conditions, However, let’s look at Secular Europe where Human Prostitution Slave Trafficking still Exists and Secular World Australia Has been Exposed on Modern Day Slavery:


The West has never abolished Slavery. They have just renamed it;




Also Sex slavery in Islam refuted here:


In the above video: Brother Daniel sites Western academia to show why Sexual Slavery was practised against the enemy combatants in order to grow numbers, otherwise if they didn’t this could wipe their own extinction. 

So for example why the Taliban:


Taliban would also force the women of enemy combatants that being the Pro American forces wives into Sexual Slavery in order to help grow their own numbers. Some people may say, those women are Muslim. However that can be disputed as ISIS may claim their Muslim but most Western Muslims will not claim that. So similarly these women are no longer real Muslims aswell for joining the U.S forces to fight against the Taliban. Therefore the Taliban, under Sharia can force the women of any combatants  to be concubines. And as stated by Daniel who sites Western academia: this is what people did in order to keep themselves away from facing extinction. In fact even Sam Harris who is a Western academic and Atheist liberal who said, Rape in biology was good thing because it helped genes spread.




Also note: We are not justifying Rape, or forced marriage. We are only show this was legitimised only in the context of War, as concubines were practised by both Islam and Christianity, in order to prolong Their own existence same way that our own existence was prolonged in the Evolutionary make up according to Atheists and secular liberals like Sam Harris.

See here, how a ExMuslim known as APUS defends Slavery.


Take over the World spread by sword:

Shariah Law = Allows Jews, Sabians and Christians and those who don’t believe to remain in their faith so long as they pay their taxes. (Jizya)

Islam spread by the Sword:



Secular Liberalism= American With 950 Bases World Wide, is not fighting for your freedom it’s a Global Empire.


Secular Westernism Spread by the Sword:


ExMuslim unable to answer, was secular liberalism spread by the sword?



Death Penalty & Execution:

Shariah Law = Recognise it. People who commit Adultery, highway robbery, Murder, Rape etc.


Secular Liberalism= Also Recognises it: Drone Strikes, Executions of Criminals-Sadam Hussain, Electric chair, Lethal Injection.


All these Westerners crying about Shariah law executing in a barbaric way, those who commit Highway robbery, Murder, Rape or Adultery, yet are silent on the hanging of Sadam Hussain. They celebrated his hanging!

Check this out West now in favour of Capital Punishment: https://m.facebook.com/groups/909294505794899?view=permalink&id=966976240026725

The secular system, says it’s barbaric to execute criminals. Such as the NZ terrorist known as Brendan Tarrant.

So what does it cost to keep him alive? Well around $5,000 per day, since he will be held in maximum prison.

That’s $73 million over 40 years! That could do a lot for health and education in NZ or Aus. Why should our taxpayer funds pay for their life….?

No, but Execution is medieval and barbaric? And outdated? Shariah law seems to be much more productive.



Interesting thought, the same Westerners call for the execution of child sex abusers. See:


The West, ” Executes” anyone they deem a national threat.

The killing of Qassam Suilaymani,


But wait? I thought the execution was outdated and barbaric?

Now imagine for a moment a Muslim organisation randomly executed a Western military high ranking officer because He threatened the Muslim civilisation. 

It would immediately be declared an “act of Terror”. 

However, the U.S gets away without being labelled Terrorist for killing Iranian Military officers, for being a threat to Western national security.

Interesting Hey?


Dress Code:

Shariah Law = Set’s a dress code, for men it’s covering the naval (Awrah) and for women, it’s covering the whole body, including the face, and some scholars say, covering everything except for face and hands.

Secular Liberalism= Workplaces regulate a dress code. If you don’t think so try dressing up in a bikini working at McDonald’s. Even Workplaces have a code not to have visible and excessive piercings. So much for Western values. Also, consider France 🇫🇷  imposes a dress code. They make it ” illegal to wear a “Niqab” or a “burka” of course moto bike helmets are fine though. So as you can see, these secularists target Muslims for their religion and only want a Western dress code.

This Australian lady below thinks, she can wear what she likes in Australia?



Social Experiment Hijab VS Western clothing against Sexual abuse


Why the Hijab? Why the Modest Wear?

When the Secular Liberals suggest that the Quranic interpretation of the Text, oppress Muslim women by imposing the Jilbaab, or the Hijab or Modest wear.

Show them this video. This lady stands up and tries to work or dance, and her tight clothing splits from the back, totally exposing her back on national media.


Westerners may now ponder over why, the Islamic belief to cover up properly which they mock, really makes sense. And the Mockery is back at them. When they go against Allah, His wrath and mockery are directed back at them.

This is one of the reasons why Islam prescribed Modest Wear. One of the reasons besides minimising the chance of sexual abuse is also to protect the honour and dignity of women from this type of embarrassment. For them, this is all fun and games, at the expense of the embarrassment of another human being.

Allah has honoured the female and has put measures to protect the status and honour of Her, yet many do not take heed.

These Secular liberalists claim that religion keeps us unprogressed and keeps women in ancient clothing;




Shariah law = (prohibits)
The Quran says”….. Gambling is the handy work of Satan. (Quran 5:90)
Indeed Allah has spoken the Truth.

Secular Liberalism= top countries non-Muslim who have lost millions due to gambling as a nation.


Paid Maternity Leave:

Shariah Law = Saudi-Arabia (10 months) Paid Maternity to leave http://www.arabnews.com/saudi-arabia/news/804181

Secular Liberalism In the West it’s only about (4 months) Paid Maternity Leave for Women

Source: http://www.kidspot.com.au/birth/trimesters/pregnancy-work-and-finance/paid-parental-leave-entitlements-in-australia



Shariah law = Under no circumstances allows Rape. And under Islamic Jurisprudence, one who engages in this receives the (Hudd) punishment meaning the perpetrator receives the death penalty. Though it’s interesting to note, Unfortunately, though most Muslims countries don’t rule by Sharia law, because of the pressures of the West imposed on them. We still find according to the statistics that the majority of Muslim nations do better when it comes to Rape. Just check out the stats below.

Refuting the claim also Islam allows the rape of female slaves or captives:


See also:


Secular Liberalism= All though Secular Democratic non-Muslim nations, do not allow Rape, this Rape is recorded as very high compared to Muslim nations. Some critics may claim that is due to Muslim nations Rape cases go unreported. The response to this, is not entirely true, as statistics also are obtained from Muslim nations and that’s why there are Muslim nations on there. Also one can argue that the Western statistics are much higher than what’s reported because even in the West it is known that most Rape cases also go “unreported”.


These are the Top countries:





Rape in the U.S by conviction records:

What the data says (and doesn’t say) about crime in the United States

Bellow in the table a data collected from 40 countries reveal non-Muslim ones to be the worst. Pay attention to Indonesia which is the biggest population in the Muslim majority and it’s nowhere near the top 10.










Secular Liberalist Atheist Sam Harris justifies Rape;


Punishing the Rape victim:

Shariah Law = In Islam the Rapist will get punished. But the victim will face no consequences. Except for the victim who may breach Islamic laws of non-free mixing. She or He may receive a lighter sentence such as flogging. Of course, no capital punishment as the Rapist would get.

Explaining except for the victim who breeches Islamic law such as not adhering to taking precautions;

Secular Liberalism = See here a Rape victim gets punished for self-defence against her Attacker:



Male Guardianship & Traveling Alone and Gender roles:

Shariah Law = Demands Women to go out with a mahram male guardian if possible.

Listen again to guardianship rules and how it makes sense;

Secular Liberalism = here in the West there is guardian facilitation. If a woman is a Student and feels unsafe to travel on public transport at night. She can contact her board of education and request a special guardian to be allocated to her. So all through the West disputes Islamic Shariah Law and women are not allowed to be alone, the West facilitates options for a Woman to take male guardianship the Irony!

Source: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/security/access/uni-safe


Gender roles. She was scared to confront the thieves so she sent her boyfriend down to have a look.



Why she didn’t go down herself if gender roles didn’t exist?

They do, biology doesn’t lie.


When they ask women what type of men they prefer to marry or have long-term relationships with, they say they prefer macho men who fit the profile of “benevolent sexists” who exude “toxic masculinity.” Even the self-labelled feminists have this preference. Given the option, no woman prefers to marry a weak man who is a pushover, who actively avoids leadership, who wants to be a meek, quiet follower of women. This type of man is literally disgusting to women.

In other words, the gender component is embedded in human nature.



Personal Hygiene:

Shariah Law = Teachers its followers 1400 years ago. That the way to clean, your Anus is to use “Water”, as the best option:
Source: https://islamqa.info/en/answers/8003/cleaning-oneself-after-relieving-oneself

Secular Liberalism = Using Toilet paper is preferred and Water is rarely used. Health experts have now condemned this here:


One can also find it interesting that the top 10 leading countries in the Corona Virus pandemic happen to be predominantly nations that have Non-Muslims.

The screenshot was taken: 19th August 2020


Seems Muslim nations are doing much better in containing the spread due to their tremendous Hygiene, even though a lot of Muslim nations are either below the poverty line or 3rd world. Now isn’t that a slap in the face?


Shariah Law = Very low

Secular Liberalism =“Most progressive, most developed” and “Happiest countries” in the world would need such amount of antidepressants!!


Where are the Muslim Nations?

Divorce Rates:

Shariah Law = Predominantly Muslim countries have the least amount of divorce rates compared to that of the West.

Secular Liberalism =

You would think, that Muslim nations who predominantly live in developing nations therefore the Un-happiest right? And that most people living in the West, in the land of modernity and enlightenment would be considered the happiest right? Not at All, as you can see their world view leads to the most divorcee. Top 10 countries happen to be that which is “Western”.

I shared above three different up to date modern stats, from different sites to show that West has highest divorce rates.

There are some critics who bring up Maldives a predominantly Muslim country which has the highest amount of divorce rate. But that comes from a old report published by the U.N back in 2002. Also when we look at Statistical analysis, there will always be a nation that goes against the rule. This is called “exception against the rule”. Therefore critics can not sweep under the carpet that Western nations suffer the most divorces, by sighting just the one Muslim nation in top10 compared to most Western countries in top10. And then conclude well there isn’t much of a diffrence between Muslim nations and Western nations when it comes to divorce. That in of itself is a fallacy, because we shouldn’t be using an exception to the rule as evidence, and rather go by majority rule. So for example, if there is only one or two Muslim countries that are the richest in the world, even richer then all Western countries. But then the most of the other Muslim countries are bellow most Western countries in GDP, no rational person would then say, Muslim countries are doing better, based on the exception to the rule, for having one or two very rich countries. Similarly just because one Muslim country like Maldives toped the chart back in 2002, does not mean that now proves that Muslim countries and Western countries are ” alike” because they are not as most of the countries in the top10 who suffer the most divorces’s are of the Western nations.



There are those who insist, Islamic nations don’t allow women to get a divorce unless it’s done by the husbands permission. This is not true, as Shariah law allows women to divorce if the husband refuses, it is known as Khula, read details;


Segregation and Equal rights.

Shariah Law = Believes in Segregation between Men and Women.

Secular Liberalism =

Will often ridicule, Islam for Men to be segregated from women. Despite believing in other forms of segerating Men from women.

Explained Here:

My Response:

Notice, this tool. Can only insult by swearing her dirty mouth when being confronted on the lie that equal rights exists, when this is far from the truth. And the West divided Men from Women.


Shariah Law = encourages to have big families. In fact Muslims are known to have the fastest fertility rate of any other race, religion or Western culture.

Secular Liberalism = discourages having a large family. In fact they mock Muslim families for having so many children.

Take a read how this theory of theirs is working against them;

Who is Converting the Fastest Islam or Secular Liberalism?

Shariah Law = Is now the fastest growing Religion.

Secular Liberalism =


We often here from critics of Islam. That the reason why Islam is growing so fast and will pass other religions as the dominant religion by 2035-2050 is based merely on fertility rates [1]. But what they won’t tell you is that Islams rivalry religion which is Christians which is leading the pack so far, between the years 2015 and 2060 will have an estimated 72 million leave Christianity and switch to another faith all together according to PEW research [2]. That’s equivalent to every Christian living in the united kingdom leaving Christianity. Imagine that for a moment. No Christians left in the land of the cross. In fact according to the same research Muslims receive the highest population of converts who convert to Islam from Christianity which is around 77% of all converts to Islam that come to them from Christianity. [3]

But yeh let’s just talk about birth rates, to undermine Islam’s growth rates.


Fertility rates


Religious switching

77% converts to Islam are Christians

Suicide Rates

Shariah Law = Forbids it.

Secular Liberalism:

See how Men in the West have highest suicide Rates:


Technology and Modern advancements also why Muslims want to move to West if Shariah is so great?

Shariah Law:


Secular Liberalism:

The industrial revolution, and its modern Advancements.

Response Video two videos.


The Salty Secular Libtards, when they no longer can tolerate the evidence you display to them will then resort to trying to label you as a Hypocrite for living in the West. And not going to live in a Shariah based Muslim country.

Well here is a message:

Topic: Who are Progressed?

Islamophobe: “How can you believe in some 1400 year old text and its moral guidelines! Get with the times. It’s 2018!”

Me: “Truth doesn’t have an expiration date.”

Islamaphobe: Yes but I think some things need to also progress in the way we approach things and realise the world is different ,people are different and world order has changed . People like you are the same people that want to enforce religion through the government and kill women because they don’t dress as you like .

Me: Just because people make up new moral standards does not mean we are not progressive if we refuse to accept them. If for example in 50 years time from now people start marrying in Incest relationship or accepting Zoophillia or say we go back to accepting child marriages to 9 or 12 year old girls in the West, just because these might be the norm in the future does not mean we all need to progress to accept them. Just because the World changes does not mean, your un progressive to accept something you disagree with.If you still insist we must still go along with this progression then you are no diffent from those oppressive religious regimes that force there own moral standards on everyone else to comply.

Islamaphobe: That’s fine ,but if you live in a certain country ,and you choose to stay then it’s not your choice ,you either progress or get the hell out . Every country expects this . Also don’t play stupid . In Australia it’s illegal and in most western countries and considered pedophilia for children that age to get married . In the United States there were some states that allowed at 14-15 …never ever 9 and the whole country is against it and they will ban it . In other regions , they do have forced child marriages as a widespread norm . So stop playing dumb . You can choose to live the way you want with 0 progression but in a country where it’s required as a condition and apart of our citizenship ,ours laws to progress then we follow the law of the land or we choose to leave ,we don’t go against the country’s way of life and then speak about religion while we continue to live in the same country . If that’s what you want then you to a country where the society doesn’t accept progression ,liberalism ,democracy ,freedom etc alps difference between forced child marriages and someone’s own personal life in the 21st century in a liberal democracy .

Me: You said that if I live in a certain country I must progress or get the hell out?
I ask who defines progression which is like i said earlier is merely based on ones subjective norms. That would be like me saying, if you live in Saudi Arabia you need to progress and obey its laws such as not being permitted to have a driver’s license. If you dont accept it, then you should get the hell out therefore unprogressed according to the law of that land. Yes I do agree that if a person lives in a particular part of the world He/She must adhere to its laws, however to call that person unprogressed for his disagreement is not a coherent consistent judgement when the one making the unprogression judgement could very well be deeme in the same way (I.e unprogressed) as most moral judgement even in the 21st century are based on ones subjective opinion, so in the eyes of most liberalists for example, going on nudist walks and parades is something quite progressive, but one can make the argument it’s not progressive at all rather it’s backward and that’s how Neanderthals use to walk back hundreds and thousands of years ago, therefore those nudist liberals who claim there progressed are actually going back in time and behaving like unprogressed animals.

As for the Age of Consent you said it was never at 9 years old in America, well your wrong, in 1885 to 1889 the age of consent was even as low as 7 in some states of America. Which was then raised much later, the point here is, that one day they may go back to those laws since laws and morals change, therefore calling somthing unprogressive based on the current norms is unethical as a thousand years from now, your moral values may be deemed as ancient and backward and they may go back to accepting marriages at a much younger stage in life, just like many other ancient values are accepted today such as public nudity at some instances. Furthermore the age of consent in the United Kingdom is 16 while in Australia it is 18. Do we now say the United kingdom is unprogressed due to its disagreement with Australia?

So let’s now stop playing the Progression police, as some kind of moral rule,
Progression is subjective and can not be applied as a Universal standard, so stop acting like a court jester as though you wish to apply one dominant rule when the same kind of unprogression assertion can be made just as valid against your own western culture and ethics deeming them as unprogressive.

A Secular Libarlists will helplessly post memes like this;


The picture is incomplete.

Where is the picture showing Western mastery of pornography? Heroin? Fornication? Sodomy, abortion, single motherhood, sex change surgery, anti depressants, drag queen story hour, single unit living pods, bug-based faux meat?

Wonders of the Modern West!

What humanity needs to realize is that science and technology are not a blank check. Yes, they have some positives, but they also destroy human life and civilization. We have yet to see the full consequences of the Industrial Revolution, but the result is not going to be good. It is looking like the result will be the end of the human species. Allahu `alam.

You can watch The Genius of Islam: Episode 1 and 2 for more elaboration on this (links below).

But the point is, the West can gloat about going to space and inventing the automobile and bombing the world into submission. But they should also take credit for unleashing a monster that has destroyed so many cultures, so many people, and arguably will lead to the extinction of humanity.

Episode 1: https://youtu.be/Wp5AHzHq0IA
Episode 2: https://youtu.be/ZNlEtBZxML8


The next posts are a response countering critics on their lies about mis-representing Shariah law:

Updated 13th Sep 2021

List of Responses Answering the Critics Fundamental Criticism of Islam.

Does Shariah Law allow one to Critique Islam or Quran?

Does Shariah Law say two female witness equal 1 Man’s witness?

Does Shariah law honore kill?

Does Shariah Law oppress Women by Forcing Hijab?

Does Shariah Law give Men more inheritance why?

Does Shariah Law allow a Man to Beat his Wife?
Video 1: https://youtu.be/Y-XzSHBfTLg
Video 2: https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=6DcF4F4US8Q

Does Shariah Law believe in Lying Takiya to further Islam?
Link 1 http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/08/taqiyya-the-ultimate-intellectual-cop-out/
Link 2

Does Shariah Law say Rape victim needs 4 Witnesses and does Rape victim get Punished. Answer is No.

Does Shariah Law simply amputate the hand of a theif or is there more to the story?

Does Shariah Law permit GFM or Genital Female circumcision?

Does Shariah Law simply Execute Gay People or punish them? Or allow them to live their Privat lives?
From minute: 6:40

Does Shariah Law Believe in Abrogated Violent verses?

Does Shariah Law stone for Adultery is this Barberic? Can it really be applied how difficult is it to apply?

Link 2: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2118316298400046&id=1615572925341055

Does Shariah law not allow to respect and follow the Law of a Non-Muslim country?

Does Shariah Law Permit Multiple Wives?

Does Shariah law permit Slaves?

Does Shariah Law segregate Men & Women?

Does Shariah Law force Women into Marriage?


Does Shariah Law command to Kill Un-Believers and Endorse Terrorism?

Refuting a Ex-Muslim on his misinterpretations of Islam condoning Terrorism?
Part 1/2 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8rEb8NfMPuc

Part 2/2:

Refuting list of misinterpreted Quranic verses:

Does Shariah law endorse to Rape Slave girl at WAR

So why did Shariah law allow Concubines and Sex Slavery?


Does Shariah law believe in Female honors killings?
Debunked here:

Does Shariah Law Permit wedding a 9 year old girl? Why did the Prophet of Islam Marry a young girl?

Part 1: https://mustafasahin33.wordpress.com/2019/02/05/refuting-pedophillia-lie-of-atheists-christian-claims-against-the-prophet-muhammed-pbuh/

Part 2: Age of Marriage was low back then. Western World.

Does Shariah law execute one who leaves Islam?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s