Why did God Create Hell and does Eternal Hell equal no Justice?


Why did Allah (God) create Hell?

One who reads the Qur’an and hadith literature cannot miss the several references concerning hell. While many would understandably appreciate why some of humanity’s worst criminals might deserve to burn in hell temporarily for their horrendous crimes, several would struggle with the idea of one enduring hell eternally for failing to believe in the correct religion.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was asked by his companions, “What is the biggest sin in the sight of Allah?” He said, “To set up rivals or those equal unto Allah, though He is the one who created you.” [Saheeh Al-Bukhari].

The Prophet described Shirk (polytheism) as the worst sin, as worship is a right due to Allah alone. It is wicked because it involves equalizing between He, who is the ultimate source of our existence and sustenance, with the creation that could barely help themselves. It is the pinnacle of ingratitude and treachery.

Allah is maximally quintessential in all His attributes. He is maximally perfect in His generosity, mercy, justice, power, knowledge, supremacy, etc. The utmost magnificence of His attributes makes Him one with an infinitely qualitative status. Allah’s sole right to the reception of worship is the logical and necessary outcome of His being ascribed with these attributes. It is the most significant right a maximally perfect being such as Allah lays claim to, and its infringement is the most severe crime that could be committed.

The severity of a crime is not only determined by how evil the crime itself is but also by the moral worth or status of the offending side. For instance, animal abuse is not as severe as human abuse because the moral status of the human being is worthier than the animals. Consistently, seeing that God is infinitely more worthy, dignified, and greater than any other being, the severity of a crime committed against God should not be subjected to human conceptions of justice that we are ordinarily accustomed to. This entails that the ultimate crime of Shirk committed against Him would justly warrant a maximal punishment which takes form in an endless sequence of epochs of suffering in hell, as it is a fitting testament to the infinite worth of the offended God.

Allah guides the one who is genuinely determined to seek the truth. He states: “Whoever Allah wishes to guide; He expands his breast to Islam” [6:125]. The individual must truly want to submit to God even if it means conceding that he has been wrong about his religious views all along, changing his moral paradigm, upsetting his family and friends, and changing his lifestyle. If that determination is truly there, then Allah would enable that individual by strengthening his willpower and guiding his decisions to take the measures necessary to acquire the truth of Islam. Allah would enable him to want to undergo his research correctly and in an unbiased fashion. Allah would assist him by emboldening him and instilling courage in him to confront his family and friends about the new religion he has embraced.

Those who willingly choose not to investigate the truth claims of serious contending belief systems such as Islam, either out of indifference or unjustified misplaced overconfidence in their current beliefs, are morally culpable, as they did not take the duty of religious inquiry seriously enough. If we contrast how much research and how factual people are when making decisions about some mundane matters (e.g., determining which car to buy) with finding out what the true religion is, we see that many fall short.

Allah states that He would not bear people’s burdens that they are not able to bear. [6:152] On the Day of Judgment, those entering hell will concede that they were wrong and worthy of blame. They will not be kicking and screaming that God was unfair to them, but rather that it was their fault. [67:10]

Some people say that we are born into our respective faiths and that it is unjust for us to be punished for something we did not choose. However, we do choose to remain in our faiths. Being born into a non-Muslim family is indeed a barrier, but it can be overcome. It is widely common to see people abandoning their parents’ belief systems and traditions for something else. The problem, however, is that many make wrong decisions when it comes to the new beliefs they decide to adopt.

Moreover, being born into something cannot be a blanket moral excuse. For instance, we would not excuse racists to remain, racists, simply because they were brought up in a racist household. We would expect them to know better and make the right decision of change later.

Some question how God can be All-Merciful, despite punishing some in hell for eternity. As was already stated, Allah will not place anybody in hell unless they have a fair opportunity to make decisions that would have placed them on the right course toward the path of guidance. Allah does not owe us salvation. Mercy is the remission or forgiveness of a penalty that is already fair to apply to begin with. This is especially the case when Allah Himself has assured us that He does not let anyone carry a burden too heavy for them to bear.

To understand “All-Merciful” as an attribute entailing that Allah is entirely merciful to everybody unconditionally is problematic. We need to understand that Allah’s attributes of mercy and wrath are appropriately relational to that, which is fitting to these attributes. For example, a rebellious Satan is not fit to receive Allah’s mercy. For Allah to never unleash His wrath on unrepentant criminals could not be loving and merciful to the victims who do not obtain justice in this life. And so on.

In summary, standard objections raised against hell stem from a lack of appreciation for God’s status as an infinitely majestic being and a misunderstanding of how His divine attributes are to be conceived. If one believes in God, as the vast majority of people do, then he ought to find out what God has to say about the purpose of our lives, how to treat people, whether there is salvation, whether God is pleased with us or not, whether we are indebted to God for our existence, etc. Man must find out what his duties are.

There is a lot at stake here, and the more there is a stake in something, the more vital it is that we have correct beliefs concerning that thing. The first essential step is to pray and yearn for God’s guidance genuinely and be willing to sacrifice all that it would take to attain it.

– By Bassam Zawadi

Let’s continue…….

Atheist: “Why is God unjust? How can He punish unbelievers for Eternity in Hell”?

Me: “Accept Islam. And God will admit you into paradise. But if you do not. Hell will be your Eternal abode”.

Atheist: “No I don’t wish to accept Islam”.

Me: But if you do not, then you will burn in hell forever”!

Atheist: I don’t care”.

Me: “You don’t care about going to an Eternal hell”?

Atheist: %@#÷^*

Me: See the point here folks, Allah is not unjust. Allah makes an “agreement” with Atheists or unbelievers “before” he puts them to hell “forever”. Atheists “accept” the condition of Eternal hell rather than paradise by refusing to “accept” Islam. Therefore an Atheist can not call: “Allah unjust” or that an Eternal punishment is “unjust”. If the Atheist refused to accept the invitation to Islam, then “technically” He has rather accepted an Eternal hellfire So why would an unbeliever claim Allah is unjust with him on the day of judgement?

Allah (SWT) makes it very clear to unbelievers in the Quran, that He warns them of Islam and warns them of the “consequences” if they refuse to accept Islam. Thus it is not unjust for hellfire for being Eternal for them, if that’s the fate Atheists have chosen for themselves!

This Day shall every person be recompensed for what he earned. No injustice (shall be done to anybody). Truly, Allah is Swift in reckoning. (Quran 40:17)


Also please visit this short video response

Where Ali Dawah responds to critics that claim Allah is an unjust God, for punishing unbelievers for Eternity for a finite sin (crime), committed on earth.
He explains using the (Quran 22:99-100) there is no such thing as a finite sin for unbelievers because Allah says in the Quran, Had we sent the Unbelievers back to earth, they will go back to their disbelief, and if we let them live forever on the earth, they would remain on disbelief forever, thus justifying an Eternal Hell. Also note, this verse doesn’t mean sending back to earth means, He will send a man that He judged back to earth, and with that same faculty of seeing Heaven, Angels, Day of Judgement, He will send back to earth, of course, no one would go back to disbelief after seeing such signs. Rather Allah when He speaks about sending them back, He is talking about making everything start all over again, where man has not seen Angels, heaven, God or hell. Allah says even if we did this, He would still go back to disbelieving even if we put him to the test again.

Bellow, is two Atheists who prove that type of arrogance listens:


Counter Rebbutal section:

Atheist wrote:


My response:

@Polymath Let me explain the I don’t care part:
An Atheist says, “he doesn’t care, or consider the Proof for the evidence of God, nor accept the Evidence from theists arguments as valid evidence for the Proof of God. Thus in his rejection has ” technically accepted to refuse to accept the Evidence, thus in doing so, He has picked for himself a destination which warns unbelievers of a punishment. Thus now no unbeliever can accuse God that they have not been “warned” thus their punishment is now justified. Also, some Atheists say Even if God was real, they will still refuse to believe in him. Martin Rowson (Atheist editor-writer and Cartoonist” says:” if God proved He existed I still wouldn’t Believe in him. (Page 22.) Another Atheist named: Thomas Nagel( Atheist Professor of Philosophy) writes: I want Atheism to be true. Is that I hope there is no God. I don’t want there to be a God. I don’t want the universe to be like that.
(Last Word p.g 130-131).

So of course there are Atheists who ” deliberately choose to disbelieve in the evidence”. Even if that evidence was black and white.
Just as there are flat earthers who ” deliberately” chose to reject the earth is round, there are also Unbelievers who deliberately deny the clear evidence of intelligent design.

Also if a sceptic was searching for the truth, Allah will guide him to Islam, the truth is most Atheist sceptics are not genuinely sincere in searching and accepting the truth.

And the arguement still stands, even if God’s religion has not convinced you it’s the truth, you have rejected the arguement for God’s existence, so in doing so you have accepted the consequences of following a theory that rejects the Evidence, thus in doing so, you have technically “accepted the consequences of Eternal damnation. If that evidence you reject turns out to be true.

Atheist wrote:


My Response:


The truth? (It is not black and white)?

Quran: We shall show them Our signs in the horizons and themselves, till it is clear to them that it is the truth. Suffices it not as to thy Lord, that He is witness over everything?
Quran 41:53

For they had denied the truth when it came to them, but there is going to reach them the news of what they used to ridicule. Quran 6:5

As one can see from the above verses, Allah tells us in the Quran the Unbelievers will receive the Truth, and this truth will be made clear for them (verses41:53). And Allah tells us in (verses 6:5) that they will still deny them.

So even if an Atheist claims his honesty about searching for truth, and claiming there is no evidence, Allah tells us they are liars.

Let’s read the next verses:
And, do not cloak (and confuse) the truth with falsehood. Do not suppress the truth knowingly. (Quran, 2:42)”

Yea, in their own (eyes), will become manifest what before they concealed. But if they were returned, they would certainly relapse to the things they were forbidden, for they are indeed liars. (Quran, 6:28)”

In these verses Allah tells us, that the Unbelievers conceal the truth, in other words, do not admit the truth even if it has convinced them, then Allah tells us, that they are liars when they claim there is no evidence for God or Islam. Therefore no matter how much an Atheist or an unbeliever claims his be sincere and still rejects Islam, Allah calls him a liar. For why now his Abode in hell is justifiable for Eternity. Because the Unbeliever has chosen the path of unbelief and accepted its consequence, therefore he can not blame Allah for the Eternal damnation the Atheist chose for himself by intentionally denying the truth. Only Honest and Sincere agnostics, unbelievers or Atheists will accept Islam, the liars and unsincere ones will die rejecting the truth, and this is clearly why they go to hell for Eternity, that’s the abode they chose for themselves. There they can not blame anyone but themselves, for accepting Eternal damnation, due to their arrogance, and insincerity.

I would also like to conclude by saying this, Atheists/Agnostics like to criticise God for eternal punishment, and how they think this is unfair, and how religion has no real justice.

However, let’s look at the Atheist worldview and the Secular system he believes to follow. Does following other than religion bring justice?

The answer is not. Take, for example, the 50 people shot and killed in the Christchurch massacre. The victim’s families in court spoke to the judge saying;

No punishment you impose on Brendan Tarrant will ever be enough for the perpetrator.

This is true when you think about it. Here is a ruthless man that killed 50 innocent people. So how is putting 1 man in jail for the rest of his already half-lived life, even compatible with the 50 lives? It is not. Even if capital punishment was imposed. Killing 1 life compared to the lives of 50 people is still not compatible.

However what would be compatible, is eternal punishment for those 50 people, and of course, compromised with the punishment of eternal unbelief.

See, religion unlike the Atheist world view gives much greater justice.

Also listen to the arguments here that Justifies why God created Hell for Unbelievers 

Also, read this related article;



Shariah Law VS Secular Liberalism


Last updated: 23rd, June. 2022

By: Mustafa Sahin (Australia Muslim Apologetics)



The Prophetic Predictions of the End times:

Must Watch:




1: Modern Day Deaths 

2: Human Rights abuses

3: Terrorism

4: Murder

5: Freedom of Expression 

6: Theft/Robbery

7: Drugs

8: Prostitution and Pornography

9: Alcohol 

10: Abortion 

11: Women and Wealth entitlement 

12: Sexism

13: Nuclear Weapons

14: Homosexuality (Lgbtiq+)

15: Beastiality

16: Incest

17: Fornication/Adultery

18: Polygamy 

19: Interest (Usuary)

20: Wealth (Riches)

21: Nation’s Most Debt

22: Charity (Donations)

23: Environmental Effects (Pollution and Destruction)

24: Slavery and Sexual Slavery

25: Expansionism (Take over the World)

26: Death Penalty (Executions)

27: Dress code

28: Gambling

29: Maternity leave

30: Rape

31: Punishing the Rape victim.

32: Male Guardianship and Gender roles

33: Personal hygiene 

34: Depression and Happyness

35: Divorce rates

36: Segregation and Equal rights

37: Fertility rates and Marriage

38: Converting the fastest

39: Suicide Rates/Patience and contention.

40: Technology (Modern Advancements)

41: Health

42: Sense of community (Structure)

43: Racism

44: Progressed and civilized

45: Education

46: Women Empowerment 

47: Rights of minorities 

48: Violence towards women 

49: Animal cruelty 



Orthodox Christian, says the Truth about Islam regarding Shariah law.

Christian Professor admits He prefers Shariah Law over Modern Laws.

A White Nationalist Christian concedes to the idea that Secular liberal beliefs have caused a lot of our modern-day problems, that we detest, see the debate;


Confession from more conservative Christians;


Source for comment taken from Youtube. Anthony Bourdain, Parts unknown Istanbul.


Shariah Law vs Secular Liberal Values.

Let’s analyse the difference and its impacts……




Number 1

Modern-day 20th-century deaths caused by Muslims vs Westerners

Shariah Law = Contributed (2 million) killed.

Secular Liberalism   = Contributed (100 million) killed.




Critic wrote:



My response:



He wrote:



My Response:

Are you that incompetent and dishonest? People suffering at the hands of Mujahideen.

Atheist and agnostic fighting for someone in the sky?

Of course, they do, Atheists and agnostics join the U.S military to invade Muslim countries to fight a religion that believes in a God in the sky 

By the way, just recently we heard a militant atheist got arrested in America where He attacked a Mosque again attacked people who believe there was a God in the sky 


Also, you have no answer, religion has no involvement in the Russian and Ukrainian conflict. It’s nationalism and human greed. Nothing to do with religion and yet you think Religion is the problem.

I also laugh at how you use, a fallacy known as a false dilemma. Look at Japan it’s peaceful without religion. Yeh, that’s now proof religion causes conflict?

Well was Japan always peaceful? What about pearl harbour? 

They are only now peaceful because they got Nuked…not because they somehow became progressed and enlightened.

If you took away nuclear warheads, the West including Japan and all the other peaceful nations your site would have all killed each other by now.

Take a read are Atheists really peaceful as they claim to be?



Number 2

Human Rights abusers, Freedom of Speech?

Shariah Law =  See the two videos for a Comprehensive Explanation of human rights.

Part 1

Part 2

Secular Liberalism  = Claims to give Human rights. But if this is true, we need an explanation from them. Such as;

– Where is the right to leak information. the  [1]
– Who ere is the right to have dual citizenship.[2]
– Where is the right to wear what you want.[3]
– Where is the right to burn a flag.[4]
– Where is the right to Hate speech.[5]
– Where is the right to Polygamy. [6]
– Where is the right, for religion in Politics.[7]

Should I continue with Liberal intolerance? Or perhaps you still think liberal values make more sense?


A Critic wrote:


My response:



So basically what we are seeing is a minority group’s human right depends on if there are enough politicians in favour of voting for that human right. If there aren’t enough numbers those human beings are denied their human rights. 

She wrote back:


My Response;

Look’s like you haven’t done your homework when it comes to Australian Law. They have changed Helal slaughter requirements, where Animals need to now be stunned, first. Before slaughter. So much for your claim, about giving rights to minorities even if they don’t have a majority vote.

By the way, even those minorities who are given some rights are, need to still be elected by the majority of voters. So it still requires a majority vote to give minorities a right.

Furthermore (Yes) certain exemptions are given, only when it’s convenient to do so even to minorities who don’t have a
voice. Certain Politicians might at times who win elections may promise rights to minorities. But this is done purely to win public support, to help him secure a seat. Think about how some white politicians might speak great about a certain ethnic community to win over the Mexicans or BLM movements.

We also need to look at other things like economical gain. The Australian government profits from the Helal industry. That’s why in some instances it may give Islamic rights to certain minorities, it may at times even give certain rights to religious practise like building mosques, this is all done because it wants to prove that it is inclusive, and unbiased or tries to live on liberal principles of freedom and diversity.

But let’s be honest, is allowing helal meat affecting or Islamasizing the West? Is Helal as confronting in your face practice? I mean having meat in your bread isn’t the same as displaying a second wife which Is pretty confronting and challenging Western ideals isn’t it? I mean a lot of non-Muslim are anti-immigration because they don’t want to see more mosques go up which can be confronted with the Australian culture and landscape. And a reason why they are doing their best is to shut down Islam in the West. That’s why they will often say, go back to your own country. Especially to those who are more conservative and confronting such as those who wear the Hijab or Burka. Is it to know to wonder why France banned the burka or Australia banned polygamy, but they had no real interest in banning a kebab did they. Because helal meat isn’t as confronting or changing the landscape as the Burka.

So yes, the Liberal government will give some form of religious freedom so long as it’s not changing too much society, but soon as the numbers grow they place a squeeze. So it’s false to say, minorities still get rights. They get rights only when it’s not much of a loss for the West, and they may give to make a gain out of it. Otherwise, minorities are not a priority for them especially if they happen to be Muslims.

So giving some basic rights to Muslims isn’t about because they care about Muslims and human rights, if they do give a right, it usually is about a political stunt to win an election or to help him retain their seat in office, it’s certainly not about caring about human rights or minorities I can assure you.

Human rights values for minorities depend upon the decision of those who are in authority and are not based on the decision of minority groups. In other words, minorities only gain rights if those in power give them rights. If those in power decide to never give them rights then those in a minority are denied basic human rights. You do realise this is how it works right.

  1. For example, the LGBTIQ were denied same-sex rights for many many years. Only after hard campaigning were those rights given. So basically you need to fight tooth and nail to get a right, though suppose there was never a majority view giving LGBTIQ a right, then the LGBTIQ would have to continue to submit to the law even though they live in a liberal democracy. And that’s the thing, most French politicians have voted against the Burka, therefore it’s now outlawed as it stands in France this right is denied basic human rights? Yes!

Secular liberal democracy can discriminate and go against human rights depending on who approves the law. If those in power decide, that they will never be in favour of the burka, and this goes on for the next 50 years or 150 years for the matter, they can easily deny human rights under their so-called liberal values.

So what exactly are you trying to defend here?


Let’s continue……

In addition an explanation of the Human rights abuses of the Afghani people.

Video 1

Video 2


The West war with Afghanistan’s Islam Part 1/2.

The West war with Afghanistan’s Islam Part 2/2


Muslim Men beating women?




See how these Secular Liberal democratic Media known as the ABC  forcefully removes an audience member, for being pro Russian.


See the video:


So if you disagree you throw him out? 


See the comments that follow:






  • Do visit a debate and counter-responses to an ExMuslim on a debate on Human rights see how Feminism is refuted in this debate:


Also visit: Are Secular Liberal Humanists peaceful?



Finally, see how secular liberals hate the very system they claim to believe in that being “human rights”.




[1] The US indictment accused Assange of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion by helping US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning gain access to privileged information

[2] Under section 44.1 Australian Law. If any member of Parliament holds dual citizenship will be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives. https://time.com/4898990/australia-dual-citizenship-politicians-joyce/

[3] The French ban on face covering (French: LOI nThis0-1192: Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l’espace public,” Law of 2010-1192: Act prohibiting concealment of the face in public space”)

[4] Greece, Germany, France & Spain do not allow, the flag or Anthem to be desecrated.

[5] Facebook has long banned hate speech — defined as violent or dehumanizing speech — based on race, gender, sexuality and other protected characteristics.

[6] In Australia, it is a criminal offence to marry a person when already married to another and is called bigamy.

[7] There is a separation between church and state. Generally, Western constitutions are not to be governed under religious law. Secular liberal laws, are above any religious influence and must be upheld as the highest form of authority. (This means no Freedom for the religious doctrine to influence or mandate modern-day politics).

Number 3


Shariah Law = Forbids Terrorism. In other words, intentionally going and targeting the civilian population, women and children for example. Also, note that there are more Terror attacks committed by Non-Muslims in the US than Muslims. For example, Muslim extremist’s who go ahead and commit acts of Terror, only account for 6% of Terrorist Attacks in the U.S

Non-Muslims however account for 90%
Of all the Terrorism cases in the U.S.





Secular Liberalism = All though Secular liberal countries forbid acts of terrorism, many war crimes have been committed by the West, from raping and killing Afgan civilians to Iraqis, and then you have the Bosnian Massacre committed by Western forces and the list goes on. Westerners even justify acts of Terrorism see video:


Number 4


Shariah Law =Capital Punishment. Has least cases of Murder.

Secular Liberalism = Punishment to lenient. Therefore Has the Highest amount of Murder rates compared to the predominantly Muslim Population watch: https://youtu.be/t_gPky76zHc

See this video:


A 13-year-old Child killer is given another chance to GGG released from prison after murdering a Child.

See the story anthe d thheartbreakak caused to this family:



Critic wrote:



My Response:

All this sympathy towards the murderer. Imagine this for a moment. The parents live 28 years of pain, thinking about the killer that murdered their child. Because they’re constantly reminded of Parole, Parole, Parole, Parole, Parole, Parole…..and on and on.

And then after suffering for 29 years, those parents finally say our hearts came to rest (relief) that his out of prison and things can now rest. She said this because she’s tired enough inside, she rather him out than in, because him being in prison keeps sending her parole reminder letters. And to add insult to injury the Media documents the killer wanting to start his own family after burning someone else family to the ground.

Know wonder people no longer put their faith in your Western system.

If this murderer was executed from day one, thvictim’sms families would have rested 28 years ago. 

Critic wrote:


My Response:

A child who’s brain isn’t fully developed, despite him telling the jury, “He enjoyed killing that child?

That seems developed to Me. Developed enough to have the mind of a serial killer.

No child says I enjoy Murder.

If He was a child, then why give him any sentence at all? The fact that He received 27 years, proves his more than just a child. Are all those judges “Monsters” for putting him in Prison for 27 years?

I’m sure if it were your child that got murdered, you would want the full force of the law. But when it’s someone elses child, will make excuses. It’s the double standards of society.

#PleaseReflect stops from making excuses for adolescence.


Critic wrote:


My response: 











Critic wrote: 



My Response:


Critic wrote:


My response:



Let’s also look at this case, see how Americans fear their society 




Not to mention all the school shootings, that are constantly on the news, but hey America is so peaceful 😅🤫


Number 5

FREEDOM of expression

Shariah Law = Allows freedom of speech with certain boundaries. Except No other Religion being Taught in Mecca or Medina but allows it everywhere else in Addition, Islam allows constructive criticism, debate and peaceful dialogue, when it comes to politics under Shariah law, Islam may censor false news and propaganda that is promoted for the west to fight against Muslims. 

Secular Liberalism  = Allows Hate Speech in some U.S states ( but some western countries Ban hate speech like Race, Anti-Semite or Sexism. Australia, Germany, France and other European countries. They Also Ban, Burka in France and Ban aspects of Islam law like Azthan from Minarets, also Polygammy recognition.

New Peer review study shows that 40% of the Millennials Favour limited free speech:

Also, consider that the West bans hate speech towards LGBTIQ and censors anti-LGBTIQ statements. Facebook is one mechanism the West censors free speech.  See more here:


Number 6


Shariah Law= Punished if you were given all resources but still took the option of Evil.
Proof: Cutting hands of theifs

Secular Liberalism   = Very Lenient punishment. Results to the West higher highest level of theft in Society compared to the Muslim World.
Proof: http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Robberies

Social experiment shows that Muslim countries are more honest than Western ones. Take a look:


Take a look how many times this man was robbed in Australia 




What is even more so interesting is that in a Facebook post there was recent news where thieves are breaking into a shopping centre in Australia.






One interesting comment reads:



This non-Muslim named Jim supported the idea of Shariah law. He received ” likes” from non-Muslims;


See guys and girls, if I was a Muslim who said the same thing, I would have been called a Radical Jihadist. But when a non-Muslim suggests cutting the hands of thieves, then He gets all the support and likes. 

This goes to show that these non-Muslims say one thing to Muslims to tease them, saying how Shariah law is backward and ancient but deep down they are in favour of stricter and much harsher laws like Shariah when it comes to dealing with thieves, the irony!

Now it gets funnier when Jim wrote back! 



I reply below


He wrote back;


I replied:


So there you have it, folks, this is what happens when they get exposed and accidentally agree with “Shariah law” and it’s dealing with thieves. Jim clearly said He would like to see us go back to ancient laws such as cutting the hand of thieves, but soon as Shariah law was mentioned, He suddenly wishes to deny He agrees to Shariah law when in fact He admitted to cutting off the hand!

These non-Muslims are laughable. 😹


Number 7



#New statistical updates coming to this section.

Shariah Law= Capital Punishment

Secular Liberalism  = Lost War on Drugs. Because Laws are too lenient.
The war on drugs is Lost.
Tonny Abbot Admits: Tiny can never win the War on Drugs.
Even U.N admits Losing War on Drugs.

See America the images of drugs Horrific 


The below Website sites 5 countries to be the worst and most affected globally by drug use.

5 World Countries with the Worst Drug Problems


The top5 listed are;

Iran 🇮🇷 

Afghanistan 🇦🇫 

Russia 🇷🇺 

The U.S.A 🇺🇲

Great Britain 🇬🇧 

Now I know what you thinking, why are there two Muslim nations leading the pack?

There is an easy explanation. Firstly Iran is a Shia nation and is not Sunni. And donThough follow Shariah requirements as understood by Sunni Jurisprudence. As for Afghanistan, that country has been stricken by War and displacement for the last 20 years, and Afghanistan was institutionalized by Western Values due to the U.S invasion to liberalise the nation which may explain the High level of Drug use. Now that the Taliban are just recently back in power in late 2021, we hope to see a significant reduction in drug use since they will most likely apply Shariah rule of law of corporal punishment to stamp out drug Trafficking. This of course will take some time perhaps years.


Number 8

Prostitution & Pornography 

Shariah Law= Forbids it. And most Muslim countries make it ” illegal”.



Secular Liberalism= Legal. The Biggest Consumers/Profits by Western Nations. Even their top politicians are watching Pornography at their workplaces http://m.theage.com.au/victoria/former-liberal-adviser-says-pornography-was-distributed-inside-victorian-parliament-20141015-116p64.html

Though you can find articles published like this online, https://www.dnpindia.in/current-affairs/top-10-most-porn-watching-countries-in-the-world-pakistan-on-the-first-position/

Where they assert, that most of the top countries that watch Pornography are Muslims, like Pakistan, Egypt Turkey, Saudi Arabia etc. The publishers of this article seem to be ( Indian publishers ) who are biased towards Pakistan and Muslims, and their sources are questionable to a claimed survey conducted over 11 countries. Again it seems like an outdated survey that most likely has very little authenticity.

It is disputed here: https://propakistani.pk/2015/01/19/pakistan-gets-wrongly-labelled-top-porn-searching-nation-proofs/

I mean even if it were true, one could argue that both Pakistan, Egypt and Turkey, are “Secularisized nations” that are non-Shariah-compliant. Nevertheless, another study, which is conducted by one of the biggest Porn stations on social media, known as PornHub. And not a single Muslim country is found in the TOP 20.



Ghana is not world’s second-highest porn watching country – Israel Laryea fact checks


In fact according to Western  Reports in 2015. This shows more evidence that most porn search comes from Non-Muslim nations;




So these two strong evidences clearly puts doubt to suggest Muslim nations rank the highest in Porn searches when not a single Muslim nation is found in the top20 countries. The claims that Muslim nations top the watch list for Porn, Contradicts other Western sources that tell a very different story.


Number 9


Shariah law  = Forbids its consumption.

Allah has “Spoken the Truth”, about Alcohol

“O you who believe! Intoxicants (all kinds of alcoholic drinks), gambling, idolatry, and divining arrows are an abomination of Satan’s handiwork. So avoid that so that you may be successful. Satan only wants to cause obesity and hatred through intoxicants and gambling and to avert you from the remembrance of Allah and prayer. So will you not desist?” (Verses 90 and 91of Surat Surat Al-Ma’idah).

ALCOHOL is classified as a Carcinogen – A cancer-causing agent.

Source: https://www.cancervic.org.au/preventing-cancer/limit-alcohol/how-alcohol-causes-cancer



Secular Liberalism = Legal. Caused the Death of 3.3 Million People in 2012


By the way, their education system for drinking in moderation has failed. Because they always have a new wave, of the new generation who like to test the limits, and thus the cycle of damage continues.


See the story of a 20-Year-old student having an incurable illness 



Famous Westerner gives up on Alcohol


Number 10


Shariah Law= Forbids it. Though some scholars argue it’s permissible before the 6O day period. As the soul has not reached the fetus as understood by Islamic theology. This also also a figure less stage anyway.

Secular Liberalism= Legal. Murders more than 1.21 million babies annually. And it can even allow it at a developed staged we’re it’s recognisable its a baby human.




Number 11

Women and Wealth entitlement and expenditure ?

Shariah Law= Women in Islam do not have to share their wealth. The husband must provide everything. If his wife works she is not required to spend on him, every money she does spend on him is only out of her good will but again his is not required from her

Secular Liberalism  = Husband is not obliged to buy anything for Her it’s only optional. He’s not required to buy her house, pay for rent, buy her clothing and pay for Her bills or even buy her shopping like groceries. Under these secular liberal values, his not even required to do this, there are no laws to even force him to pay for her living expenses. Where as in Islam if a husband refuses to pay for all her maintenance she can now seek divorce since his breaking Islamic requirements, this reflects how women in Islam have greater assistance then non Muslim women get where she has none of those entitlements, of course the Islanic critics will talk about how Muslim women get less of a inheritance compared to Muslim men, but the reason which they refuse to acknowledge why this is, again it’s because Men are force to provide for the opposite sex, while women are not obligated to provide for the opposite sex. 


Number 12


Shariah Law= We Created men and women equal in Allah’s sight, though Islam understands they have biological differences. And Men and Women can understand they are different, but they can also work their differences harmoniously without trying to live up to man’s and women’s expectations. They each go at their own pace. Islam does believe however in certain gender roles.

We have written a short paper here on Gender roles in Islam outlined:


Secular Liberalism = Believes in Equal Rights but check this out. It seems what they encourage isn’t reflected in their modern Society:

Also consider: The Term (Feminism) originates from Western Activists. This Term is Un-Known in the Muslim World due to Female oppression being Low in Muslim World. Most Feminist Movements are located in Western World.

U.S soldier, sexist comment?

American Soldier tells Iraqi soldiers that they are acting like a bunch of women. Due to them being scared and coward.

See video: https://www.facebook.com/FireourGovernment/videos/415058006628433/

Also, note that the West believes in gender roles. That’s why they will never choose a woman to jump in the boxing ring to fight Mike Tyson. They will always pick a Man to do that.

Some unfortunate ignorant Muslim wrote, I responded to (bai lo) regarding women’s testimony in the Quran.





If you think that the West isn’t gender-biased? Check it out:



https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2022/02/25/russia-invasion-ukraine-bans-male-citizens-leaving/6936471001of /


Watch https://fb.watch/bAlTeqzyPI/

A Feminist wrote:



My response:

We as Muslims don’t expect anything, of course, true Muslims believe women are more responsible with the caretaking responsibility while Men are more prioritised in duties like Jihad.

But that is not what Feminists like to preach, instead, they preach that there must be complete equality between Men and Women, and despite this, the Ukrainian government makes it mandatory for men but not women.

What is even more peculiar the Ukrainian government doesn’t make it mandatory to go to war, for 18-year-old girls who don’t have children or are not married. So even single girls who have no family or small kids to take care of nor any elderly member of the family to look after, despite this these girls are still exempted from fighting and are not given the same mandatory war duty as 18-year-old men. And what about if 18-year-old men, don’t have any younger brothers or siblings, or mum to look after, well He still needs to serve. He has no option, not to serve.

So saying 15% of females make up the Ukrainian army is irrelevant as their service to their country in war is not mandatory.

So this begs the question if young men are required to fight why not single independent young women?

Why isn’t that made mandatory?

This goes to show how these liberals deep down believe in gender roles, and there is no such thing as true equality, when shit hits the fan, everyone suddenly knows their place.

Also, I bet if the Ukrainian government said, every Ukrainian woman aged between 18 to 60, must stay home and look after their family and children with all cleaning and, cooking.

Then watch how they all get outraged hurling misogyny slurs.


Bellow nice comment from Impala Rag Dude,



Number 13

Nuclear Weapons

Shariah Law = Forbids its use.
All though Pakistan has Nukes, which is a Democratic constitution. A Real Shariah Law State forbids its use due to breaking Rules of engagement like Innocent lives, cutting down trees and livestock, and poisoning the crops. These are all forbidden in Islamic war protocols.

Secular Liberalism = Legal, Example of use: Hiroshima/Nagasaki 120,000 Dead innocent women children including livestock, poisoned crops and land through depleted uranium causing years of Birth defects for generations to come.


We ask is Islam a threat for the extinction of humanity or the West, pointing Nuclaer warheads at one another? Russia VS the West?


Number 14

Homosexuality (Lgbtiq+)

Shariah Law = Forbids it.


Secular Liberalism = Legal. One of the main factors of the Spread of HIV.

Over 690 000 [500 000− 970 000] people died of HIV-related illnesses worldwide just alone in 2019.



We have also put some arguments to disprove Homosexuality 



See also how a Transgender is debunked 



Number 15

Beastiality (Sexual intercourse with Animals

Shariah Law = forbids it.

Have a read here:




Source: http://www.answering-christianity.com/sex_with_animals_forbidden.htm
Therefore Every Muslim country Forbids it.


Secular Liberalism=  There are still to this very day, Secular liberal countries that Legalize it.


See here, how Ex-Muslims who have become Secular and Liberal endorse Sex with Animals.


Number 16


Shariah Law = Forbids it: http://islamqa.info/en/84982


Secular Liberalism= all though most Western countries make it illegal, under true Secular Liberal dogma, it is not illegal as it is Freedom of right to do it. So long as you use contraception and it’s a consensual agreement.

See here:


Number 17


Shariah Law = Forbidden.




Secular Liberalism= Legal and encouraged. Fornication/Adultery caused the spread of Sexual Transmitted Disease 1 in 6 Females in West Contract STI

The U.S tops the Chart at 126 Million cases.

It is a scientifically clinically proven fact that the more sexual partners a person’s had the less likely the person is to pair-bond (be committed) to a single partner in a long term relationship.

“women who have more than one intimanationsmarital relationship have an increased risk of marital dissolution.”

Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227546156_Premarital_Sex_Premarital_Cohabitation_and_the_Risk_of_Subsequent_Marital_Dissolution_Among_Women

Note, that the source is non-Muslim, therefore their understanding of pre-marital courtship is different from that of Muslims.

So yes, you should ask and judge her based on her previous partner count if she is a good potential wife for you.

Also, considering the result of Fornication leads to a great contribution to these stats. Notice there all Non-Muslim nations at the highest;


Watch below how Western Secular Media makes the one committing Adultery look like the Victim!



Since the West has no laws to punish people who cheat on their partners, as Islam does. Take a look to see the TOP 10 countries all happened to be non-Muslim






Thus Muslim nations are more faithful, because they are God-fearing nations, unlike the West which takes God out of the equation and focuses more on individual liberty and personal choices including a state to achieve maximum pleasure at the expense of raising your children fatherless or motherless. Praise be to Allah the Islamic community is much better when it comes to being faithful to one’s partner.


See here how an American father catches his wife cheating and tells her, he’s going to show the kids what their mother has done:



Number 18


Shariah Law = The only religion that has the phrase “only marry 1” but we can marry 2, 3 or 4 with the condition we act justly between them all.

Secular Liberalism = In the West you can be married and have 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  girlfriends you can be intimate with on the s, ide there is no law to forbid this act.

In fact: More than 30,000 married Australians are found ‘cheating’ every month:


Furthermore, ExMuslim Atheist liberal, Harris Sultan boasts about having more women than Prophet Muhammed (pbuh)




Interesting that they mock Muslims for heaven with 72 Houri? And here they are these Ex-Murtads bragging behind closed doors how many women they have been with? 

The irony hey? Maximum pleasure hey Harris? 😁


Number 19


Shariah Law = Forbids it.

Secular Liberalism= Legal. In the United States of America since “Interest” is part of their economy the U.S financial system is under a Debt of 21 Trillion+ Dollars which f d   a bt Crisis. http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/

See also this video, how Interest has ruined nations 



Number 20

“Riches” and Wealth

Shariah Law = Islam continuously encourages you to donate your Wealth. Islam is favoured by Allah when it comes to Wealth. But has also either blessed or cursed some nations by Wealth to Test them or as a form of punishment.

Secular Liberalism =

They write;

Many Islamic countries are poor. This is due to their backwardness 


You say, so many Islamic countries are poor. That may be true, but 5 out of the 25 richest countries in the world happen to be Muslim. With the highest ranking GDP.



That said, most Muslim country’s GDP is pretty much the standard of the majority of the Western countries:


I know what a Westerner will say, they will say the reason why Muslim countries top the GDP is because of all that oil, and not because of their hard work.

Well, my response would be that it just shows how Allah blessed those Muslims, and they didn’t even have to work for it, like dogs.

Is it to know wonder that most of the biggest volumes of natural resources are found in the middle east? Is that just a coincidence or divine intervention?

Even President Donald Trump advocated looting the oil. Take a listen;

Also, consider most Western countries did a lot of bad deeds to get where they did, besides the industrial revolution. Take for example how Brittian looted over 45 trillion Dollars from India.

Much more looting by the West could be mentioned, how they looted blood diamonds out of Africa.


And how the West invaded almost the whole globe, from the West to the East. Like South Africa, India, Australia to America where it reaped from all its natural resources, and then to add insult to injury took slaves out of Africa to work forcefully and build the West.

But yeh, please go on and tell us more about how the Western world is so rich compared to the Muslim nations, was it really all just hard work, or did a lot of looting really gave you a great head start?

Also, consider all though Western countries are rich, they also have the biggest debt out of any other nation. See the next post below. Also about Western comments about Muslims giving charity to religious institutions, instead of using the money to help the poor. This comment is stupid, because when Muslims donate money to their religious organisations, that money is used to help the poor people as most of those funds go to help projects such as building orphanages, and water wells in Africa so people can have access to fresh clean water, including the donations to help the poor with food and clothing. See our post under “Charity and Donations ” it’s Religious people who donate more money to the poor than those who call themselves Atheists who appeal to secular liberalism.


Critic wrote:




By the way, notice how these scum Atheist agnostics put all eggs in one basket saying religion keeps us backwards, despite predominantly Christian nations being rich wealthy and educated, perhaps these Atheists are so shallow that they think Christian nations are predominately Atheist? 

As for Christians themselves who boast about the Wealth of the West and look down upon majority Muslim natuins, Jesus (pbuh) has a message for you;





Sometimes if your wondering, why Muslim nations are suffering much more compared to the West nations? Financially, economically, technologically, and so forth.

Majority if not all the Muslims agree that this is because Allah is not happy with Us. I agree this can be one of the reasons, but it’s not overall the ONLY reason.

Indeed, Allah has bigger plans for Us, if indeed life was too easy, then surely you will see corruption on the earth.

So notice, Atheists and materialists will have you believed that, when you become so technologically advanced, you become powerful, economically as a result people come out of poverty, or poor living standards, and get to enjoy life to its maximum, but what they don’t realize is that, these so-called good times, turn people obesity, their minds become morally bankrupt, as they have too much spare time on their hands, so they will resort to drugs and alcohol as their go-to party drug, they will always be thirsty for more pleasure, and to entertain new desires, due to the ample time, they lose focus with raising a family, cause all they care about is themselves and how to make life as enjoyable for them, why would anyone want to waste their lives raising a crying child. That’s why Homosexuality is very appealing, house has two men, to male income, no children to worry about, no nagging wife. Just hold your gay husbands hand and enjoy the world with two male incomes.

Of course this ends up, being a destruction for them in the long wrong, where Men no longer identify as Men and Women don’t identify as women, the decrease of fertility rates, and divorce rates, and the use of illegal substances, is just the tip of the iceberg for these people, so do not be swayed by their living standards, it is only designed to create weak men, and awful times, but Satan (iblis) will make it look pleasurable, but underneath is a dark sad reality.


Number 21

Nations most Debt

Shariah Law = Encourages not to get into financial debts and Forbids things like loans that have “interest”. And so when we look at the world debt crises, the Muslim nations are doing much better, when it comes to debt.

Secular Liberalism= Non-Muslim countries have the worst record in” take a look at the top countries:





Number 22

Charity and Donations

Shariah Law = Compulsory if you’re able. Known as Zakah. Hence a solution to end world poverty.

Secular Liberalism= Not compulsory but rather optional even if you are a billionaire. Hence has contributed to World Poverty. The Poor give more money to charity than the rich a study finds. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5937100

Religious people are more generous another study finds. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10885180/Religion-makes-people-more-generous.html

Interesting how secular liberalism shuns organized Religion right, as being bad for human beings right?



Number 23

Environmental Effects

Shariah Law = Not the biggest Polluters 

Secular Liberalism = Australia & U.S.A biggest Pollutionists http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2009-09-11/australians-the-worlds-worst-polluters/1425986

Some interesting insight of non Muslims admitting to this:



Continue reading